What each does best
| Job | TradingView | Coinglass |
|---|---|---|
| Charting, drawing tools, Pine Script indicators | ✓ best in class | — |
| Crypto screener by price, volume, technical rating | ✓ | partly |
| Aggregated open interest across exchanges | partly (per symbol on charts) | ✓ |
| Funding rates, liquidations, liquidation heatmap | — | ✓ |
| Long/short ratios and ETF flows | — | ✓ |
The missing step: finding the coin
A typical futures workflow is: find a candidate, check its derivatives data, then chart the entry. TradingView covers the chart and Coinglass the data. The first step, searching 900 perpetuals for the ones where price, open interest and funding line up, is what a scanner is for.
Shortlist before you chart
Run it in CryptoScanX, check the shortlisted coins' funding and liquidations on Coinglass, then plan the trade on TradingView.
Coinglass and TradingView are trademarks of their respective owners. CryptoScanX is an independent product and is not affiliated with or endorsed by them.
Frequently asked questions
Is Coinglass better than TradingView?
They do different jobs. TradingView is for charting price; Coinglass is for derivatives data like open interest, funding and liquidations. Most futures traders use both.
Can TradingView show funding rates?
Funding is not a standard TradingView feature for most perpetuals. Coinglass, Coinalyze or the exchange itself show it. CryptoScanX uses funding as a scan condition.
Do I need a scanner if I have both?
If you trade only a few coins, maybe not. If you want to catch setups across hundreds of perpetuals without watching them all, a scanner with alerts saves the searching.